Annex E

(Informative)

Pressuremeter Test (PMT)

E.1 Example of a method to calculate the bearing resistance of spread foundations

(1) The following is an example of a method to calculate the bearing resistance of spread foundations using a semi-empirical method and the results of an MPM test.

(2) The bearing resistance is calculated from:

R/A' = σv0 + k(pLMp0)

where

R
is the resistance of the foundation against normal loads;
A'
is the effective base area as defined in EN 1997-1;
σv0
is the total (initial) vertical stress at the level of the foundation base;
pLM
is the representative value of the Ménard limit pressures at the base of the spread foundation;
p0
is [K0v0u) + u] with K0 conventionally equal to 0,5, σv0 is the total (initial) vertical stress at the test level and u is the pore pressure at the test level;
k
is a bearing resistance factor given in Table E.1;
B
is the width of the foundation;
L
is the length of the foundation;
De
is the equivalent depth of foundation.
Table E.1 — Correlations for deriving the bearing resistance factor, k, for spread foundations
Soil category category pLM
MPa
k
Clay and silt A
B
C
< 0,7
1,2–2,0
>2,5
0,8 [1 + 0,25 (0,6 + 0,4 B/L) × De/B]
0,8 |1 + 0,35 (0,6 + 0,4 B/L) × De/B]
0,8 [1 + 0,50 (0,6 + 0,4 B/L) × De/B]
Sand and gravel A
B
C
<0,5
1,0–2,0
>2,5
[1 + 0,35 (0,6 + 0,4 B/L) × De/B]
[1 + 0,50 (0,6 + 0,4 B/L) × De/B]
[1 + 0,80 (0,6 + 0,4 B/L) × De/B]
Chalk     1,31 [1 + 0,27 (0,6 + 0,4 B/L) × De/B]
Marl and weathered rock     [1 + 0,27 (0,6 + 0,4 B/L) × De/B]

NOTE This example was published by the French Ministère de l'Equipement du Logement et des Transport (1993). For additional information and examples, see X.3.2.

E.2 Example of a method to calculate the settlements for spread foundations

(1) The following is an example of a method to calculate the settlement, (s), of spread foundations using a semi-empirical method developed for MPM tests.

where

B0
is a reference width of 0,6 m;
λd, λc
are shape factors given in Table E.2;
α
is a theological factor given in Table E.3;
Ec
is the weighted value of EM immediately below the foundation;
Ed
is the harmonic mean of EM in all layers up to 8 × B below the foundation;
σv0
is the total (initial) vertical stress at the level of the foundation base;
q
is the design normal pressure applied on the foundation.
Table E.2 — The shape coefficients, λc, λd for settlement of spread foundations
L/B Circle Square 2 3 5 20
λc
λd
1
1
1,12
1,1
1,53
1,2
1,78
1,3
2,14
1,4
2,65
1,5
Table E.3 — Correlations for deriving the coefficient α for spread foundations
Type of ground Description EM/pLM α
Peat     1
Clay Over-consolidated
Normally consolidated
Remoulded
  > 16  
9—16
7—9
1
0,67
0,5
Silt Over-consolidated
Normally consolidated
>14
5—14
0,67
0,5
Sand   >12
5–12
0,5
0,33
Sand and gravel   >10
6–10
0,33
0,25
Rock Extensively fractured
Unaltered
Weathered
  0,33
0,5
0,67

NOTE This example was published by the French Ministère de l'Equipement du Logement et des Transport (1993). For additional information and examples, see X.3.2.

E.3 Example of a method to calculate the compressive resistance of a single pile

(1) The following is an example of a method to calculate the ultimate compressive resistance, Q, of piles from the MPM test, using:

Q = A × k × [pLMp0] + PΣ[qsi × zi]

where

A
is the base area of the pile which is equal to the actual area for close ended piles and part of that area for open-ended piles;
pLM
is the representative value of the limit pressure at the base of the pile corrected for any weak layers below;
p0
is [K0v0u)+ u] with K0 conventionally equal to 0,5, and σv0 is the total (initial) vertical stress at the test level and u is the pore pressure at the test level;
k
is a compression resistance factor given in Table E.4;
P
is the pile perimeter;
qsi
is the unit shaft resistance for soil layer i given by Figure E.1 read in conjunction with Table E.5;
zi
is the thickness of soil layer i.

NOTE This example was published by the French Ministerè de l'Equipement du Logement et des Transport (1993). For additional information and examples, see X.3.2.

Table E.4 — Values of the compression resistance factor, k, for axially loaded piles
Soil category Category pLM
MPa
Bored piles and small displacement piles Full displacement piles
Clay and silt A
B
C
< 0,7
1,2—2,0
> 2,5
1,1
1,2
1,3
1,4
1,5
1,6
Sand and gravel A
B
C
< 0,5
1,0—2,0
> 2,5
1,0
1,1
1,2
4,2
3,7
3,2
Chalk A
B
C
< 0,7
1,0—2,5
> 3,0
1,1
1,4
1,8
1,6
2,2
2,6
Marl A
B
1,5—4,0
> 4,5
1,8
1,8
2,6
2,6
Weathered rock A
B
2,5—4,0
> 4,5
a a
a) Choose k for the closest soil category.
Table E.5 — The selection of design curves for unit shaft resistance
Soil category Clay and silt Sand and gravel Chalk Marl Weathered rock
pLM category A B C A B C A B C A B  
Pile type                        
Bored piles and caissons No support
Mud support
Temporary casing
Permanent casing
1
1
1
1
1/2
1/2
1/2
1
2/3
1/2
1/2
1

1
1
1

1/2
1/2
1

2/3
2/3
2
1
1
1
3
3
2
4/5
4/5
3/4
3
3
3
2
4/5
4/5
4
3
6
6

Hand-dug caisson   1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6
Displacement piles Closed end steel tube
Prefab. Concrete
Driven cast in-situ
Coated shaft (concrete driven steel a)
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
4
1 2 3 3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4

Grouted piles Low pressure High pressure 1
1
2
4
2
5
3
5
3
5
3
6
2
3
5
4
6
5
6
5
6

7
a A preformed steel pile of tubular or H-section, with enlarged shoe, is driven with simultaneous pumping of concrete (or mortar) into the annular space.
Unit shaft resistance for axially loaded piles

Key

  • (X) Limit pressure (pLM), (Y) Unit shall resistance (qsi)
  • 1 to 7 design curves for unit shaft resistance
Figure E.1 — Unit shaft resistance for axially loaded piles

Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design — Part 2: Ground investigation and testing